Beyond CBT: A Biopsychosocial Framework for Complex Mental Health

Many clients seek therapy after previous treatments (such as CBT, short term interventions, or medication) have failed to create lasting change. They may have received diagnoses like anxiety, depression, ADHD, or a personality disorder, yet continue to feel misunderstood. This blog explores why such treatments often fall short and why a biopsychosocial, depth oriented approach is better suited for complex emotional presentations.

Why the Medical Model Falls Short in Treating Complex Mental Health

The medical model is grounded in symptom categorisation and the assumption that psychological difficulties function like physical diseases. While it offers consistency in diagnosis, the medical model often reduces complex emotional suffering to a checklist of symptoms. This can obscure the developmental, relational, and contextual origins of distress.

For individuals with trauma histories, personality vulnerabilities, or neurodevelopmental differences, symptoms like panic, low mood, or impulsivity are not isolated events. They are part of a coherent, lived narrative; one shaped by survival strategies, interpersonal patterns, and relational injuries. Treatment needs to engage with these deeper layers, not just the surface behaviour.

Beyond CBT: Why Depth Therapy is Needed

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) can be helpful for clearly defined problems such as phobias or compulsions. However, for many clients, particularly those with complex trauma, emotional dysregulation, or entrenched relational difficulties, CBT often fails to generate lasting change. These clients require a therapy that can hold complexity, explore the roots of suffering, and support integration over symptom suppression.

Such therapy goes beyond thought monitoring and behaviour change. It asks: Where did this fear originate? Why does this relational pattern persist? How do early experiences shape present self perception? This is the kind of depth work that makes transformation possible.

A Biopsychosocial Model for Complex Presentations

Rather than simplifying distress into symptom clusters, a biopsychosocial approach seeks to understand the full person. This model considers three intersecting domains:

Biological Sensitivity

Biology forms the foundation of personality and psychological functioning. Genetic predispositions, temperament, and nervous system regulation influence how an individual experiences emotion, stress, and relationships. Neurodivergent traits such as heightened sensory processing, differences in executive function, or reward sensitivity may predispose individuals to certain challenges, but also shape their strengths. These traits should not be viewed as deficits. Rather, they represent core organising features that shape how a person forms identity, engages with the world, and navigates relationships.

Understanding the biological dimension means recognising that each client brings a unique neurobiological template that influences how they perceive the world and manage internal states. Treatment must align with this template rather than override it.

Psychological Vulnerability

This domain includes the development of attachment styles, emotional regulation, identity, and defence mechanisms. These are shaped over time in response to early caregiving, trauma, and internal conflict. Maladaptive patterns are often adaptive responses to earlier environments. Indeed, shutting down, dissociating, or overachieving may have once been essential strategies for survival.

Therapy must seek to understand these patterns in context, honouring them as attempts to cope and adapt, while also supporting clients in developing more flexible and integrated ways of functioning.

Social and Cultural Embedding

Psychological functioning is embedded within larger sociocultural systems. Experiences of misdiagnosis, invalidation, or marginalisation are common among women, racialised individuals, and neurodivergent people whose emotional or behavioural differences are often misunderstood. Social class, family structure, and cultural scripts further shape how people express distress and what options are available for healing.

Understanding the social context means recognising how systems and cultural narratives influence identity, self worth, and access to care. For therapy to be effective, it must consider these broader structures and not reduce the problem to individual pathology.

How Biopsychosocial Assessment Supports Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment

Accurate diagnosis and effective treatment planning require an integrated biopsychosocial assessment. This process begins with a comprehensive clinical interview exploring the client’s developmental history, attachment patterns, and presenting concerns. Cognitive testing helps assess executive functioning, memory, language, and attention. Emotional functioning is evaluated through interviews and projective tools to understand internal conflicts, affect tolerance, and relational patterns.

Input from partners or family members and self report questionnaires further triangulate the clinical picture. The result is a psychologically rich formulation that explains how symptoms developed, what maintains them, and how change can be supported. This formulation, rather than a label, becomes the foundation for meaningful treatment.

By understanding the interaction of biological traits, psychological defences, and social context, clinicians can tailor therapy that respects the client’s developmental pathway. This allows for nuanced diagnosis, targeted intervention, and therapeutic alignment with the client's lived experience.

The Role of Diagnosis in Depth Oriented Therapy

Even in exploratory therapy, diagnosis remains important, not as a label to reduce complexity, but as a tool for:

• Guiding treatment planning based on personality structure

• Setting realistic expectations about prognosis and process

• Helping clients feel seen, named, and understood

• Communicating effectively with other healthcare professionals

A well considered diagnosis enables therapists to empathise accurately, pace therapy appropriately, and anticipate challenges such as dependency, fear of intimacy, or treatment resistance. It protects the therapeutic alliance and supports long term outcomes.

Domain	Focus	Clinical Implications
Biological	Genetic traits, temperament, neurodevelopmental differences (e.g., ADHD, autism), nervous system regulation	Therapy should align with neurobiological sensitivities and strengths; avoid pathologising differences
Psychological	Attachment patterns, emotional regulation, defence mechanisms, trauma history, identity formation	Support adaptive restructuring of defences; work through early relational injuries and internal conflicts
Social / Cultural	Cultural scripts, family systems, marginalisation, gender roles, access to care, misdiagnosis	Understand systemic barriers and cultural influences; validate identity and experience within social context

Conclusion

When therapy fails to work, the issue may not be the client’s resistance or lack of motivation, but the limitations of short term or surface level approaches. A biopsychosocial, depth oriented model offers a more respectful and effective framework, one that considers the whole person and builds a treatment plan around their unique psychological landscape.

This model is particularly important for clients with complex trauma, neurodivergence, or longstanding relational difficulties. It supports a therapeutic process that is exploratory, integrative, and sustainable. Solid diagnosis, thoughtful formulation, and personalised care are not luxuries, they are necessities for meaningful psychological change.

Written by Kirstan Lloyd, Clinical Psychologist

Founder of the Helix Centre, a UK based psychology and psychotherapy practice specialising in neurodiversity, mental health, and therapeutic assessment. This article was written by Kirstan with the support of AI research tools and is grounded in recent literature from psychology, neuroscience, and trauma informed care.

References

• Barlow, D. H. (2004). Psychological treatments. American Psychologist, 59(9), 869–878.

• Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (2003). Psychoanalytic Theories: Perspectives from Developmental Psychopathology. Whurr Publishers.

• Frank, M. et al. (2025). Influences of sociodemographic and psychological factors on the improvement of trait resilience after inpatient psychotherapeutic treatment. Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

• Kolla, N. J., et al. (2025). Impulsivity, compulsivity and externalizing behaviors in adults with ADHD and/or borderline personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research.

• Linehan, M. (1993). Cognitive Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. Guilford Press.

• McWilliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic Diagnosis: Understanding Personality Structure in the Clinical Process (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

• Peppler, K. A. (2025). Understanding the lived experience of suicide risk for autistic young adults: A phenomenological study. Doctoral Dissertation, Queen's University, Canada.

• Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self Regulation. Norton.

• Shedler, J. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65(2), 98–109.

• Silva, R. et al. (2025). The mediating effect of personality on the relationship between childhood abuse and adult aggression and emotionality. Journal of Personality Disorders.

• Sinha, R. et al. (2025). Individual differences in prediction error processing and emotional learning in trauma survivors. Trends in Neurosciences.

• von Polier, G. et al. (2025). Voice as a digital phenotype for ADHD: Diagnostic potential in adolescent girls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.

  
  

(Note: References were used for conceptual framing and clinical accuracy. This is not an academic article.)